Intel fourteenth Gen “Meteor Lake” APUs Reportedly Feature Ray Tracing, May Lack XeSS
Intel’s Next Gen Raptor Lake APUs appear to be playing get up to speed to AMD’s coordinated illustrations in additional ways than one. Twitter client Coelacanth’s Dream has uncovered data that shows Intel’s obligation to bring beam following help to even its IGP (Integrated Graphics Processing) tiles. As per spot and pieces from Intel Graphics Compiler (IGC) code patches, it is by all accounts affirmed that beam following help is without a doubt coming to the TSMC-made, 3nm GPU tiles in Raptor Lake. The kicker here is the presence of banners that distinguish whether the iGPU is of the “iGFX_meteorlake” type – assuming this is the case, IGC sets beam following help to empowered.
Puzzlingly, Intel’s upscaling innovation, Xe SuperSampling (XeSS) could be good and gone – essentially for the present. It appears to be that IGC patches for the impending APU family actually don’t take into account DPAS (Dot Product Accumulate Systolic) guidelines – directions that depend on XMX (Intel Xe Matrix Extensions), the AI motors liable for executing 128 FP16/BF16, 256 INT8, or 512 INT4/INT2 tasks per clock. These low-accuracy activities are the spirit of algorithmic supersampling innovations like XeSS.
It appears to be bizarre that Intel would make a special effort to empower beam following on its APUs, which will fundamentally highlight not many of the comparing equipment gas pedals because of kick the bucket size requirements (restricting beam following execution), instead of involving that equivalent space for XMX gas pedals, which could assist with further developing execution through admittance to XeSS. Obviously, these are pieces and pieces gathered from IGC, Intel actually has work ahead before Raptor Lake at any point raises a ruckus around town.
Taking into account Intel’s new execution misfortunes, it is not yet clear assuming Meteor Lake will come around in or around its arranged send off. A unit of new innovations are being coordinated simultaneously -, for example, the CPU tile, which is being fabricated in Intel’s new assembling process, Intel 4. The GPU tile itself has been affirmed by Intel to utilize TSMC’s 3nm assembling process, yet all may not be above and beyond at designs land; it appears to be that Intel has chosen for stop GPU tile creation at the 3 nm process on TSMC’s foundries. Hypothesis places Intel as choosing for move the assembling system towards the more performant and power-productive TSMC 3E interaction, which could seem OK considering power effectiveness necessities of APU plans.
